Alliance Clinical Network

Proven Site Strategies: Accelerating Startup, Recruitment, and Retention in Dermatology Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are the engine of medical progress, yet in dermatology, their velocity is often hindered by operational friction. While innovative therapies for chronic and rare skin diseases advance through the pipeline, the time it takes to activate trial sites and enroll participants can mean the difference between first-to-market leadership and a stalled clinical program.
 
This challenge comes at a time when the global dermatology drug market is expanding at an unprecedented pace. Valued at approximately $23.9 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $42.3 billion by 2030, the market’s rapid growth reflects both the rising prevalence of chronic skin conditions and the surge of therapeutic innovation.1
 
Against this backdrop, the urgency of accelerating dermatology clinical trials is apparent. Every month shaved off development timelines translates into significant financial returns and earlier access to life-changing treatments for patients.
 

Why Site Startup Delays Slow Dermatology Clinical Trials

The path from protocol to first-patient-in is often the most delicate period of dermatology research. Sponsors face a convergence of headwinds:

  • Recruitment intensity: Across therapeutic areas, 80 to 86 percent of clinical studies fail to meet enrollment targets or timelines. In dermatology, psoriasis studies compete for the same patient pools, while rare conditions like bullous pemphigoid or cutaneous lymphomas face extreme scarcity.2,3
  • Limited awareness and mistrust: Many potential participants are unaware of dermatology trial opportunities. Others remain skeptical due to historical inequities in healthcare and research, which contribute to mistrust among underrepresented populations.
  • Operational complexity: Dermatology trials often require specialized imaging, biomarker assessments, and seasonally sensitive enrollment (e.g., psoriasis and atopic dermatitis flares), extending site activation timelines.
  • Retention challenges: Strict study designs and high participant burden make dermatology trials especially vulnerable to attrition. Mandatory washout periods, frequent visits, and complex assessments discourage participation. Dropout rates also remain high. Acne trials report attrition of 25–30 percent, and adherence to dermatology therapies ranges from as low as seven percent for topicals to 60 percent for systemic therapies.4 Such variability highlights the difficulty of sustaining engagement, particularly among adolescents and young adults.
  • Geographic inaccessibility: Many studies are clustered at academic centers, far from underserved communities where skin disease prevalence is high. This misalignment limits diversity and slows enrollment.



Left unaddressed, these barriers delay trials and compromise scientific validity, regulatory confidence, and commercial impact.

Five Levers to Accelerate Dermatology Trials

The good news: these challenges are not insurmountable. In today’s clinical ecosystem, the fastest-moving sponsors are those that anticipate barriers and re-engineer their operating models. Five strategic levers consistently distinguish successful trials from the rest:

1. Early Patient Engagement
Building awareness and trust reduces lag between site activation and the first patient in. Some practical approaches include:

  • Culturally sensitive educational materials that address common misconceptions and foster confidence.
  • Training site staff to explain trial procedures in patient-friendly terms.
  • Support communities that connect participants and reduce isolation during trials.
  • Digital and community-based education campaigns amplify these efforts, ensuring patients understand trial safety, benefits, and logistics before enrollment begins.

2. Qualified Patient Databases
Recruitment databases play a critical role in ensuring diversity and efficiency in clinical trials by providing access to large pools of pre-screened and consented participants. Alliance Clinical Network, for example, maintains a consented database of more than 250,000 potential participants, 85 percent from underrepresented groups.5 Such databases allow sponsors to match eligible participants across indications and target populations that have been historically excluded.


3. Purpose-Built, Accessible Sites
Strategic site placement in underserved communities expands access and enhances diversity, an essential regulatory and scientific priority. Alliance has established seven purpose-built sites in metropolitan areas across California, Nevada, and Texas to minimize travel burden and employ culturally competent staff. As emphasized at a 2023 JAMA Dermatology summit, diverse trial populations are critical for producing generalizable results.6


4. Operational Agility
Sponsors that minimize participant burden and streamline operations see measurable gains in adherence and retention.7
 
Key tactics include:

  • Tele-dermatology assessments to shorten enrollment windows.
  • Flexible scheduling with evening/weekend availability and simplified visit protocols.
  • Mobile-enabled reminders and virtual visit options to reduce missed appointments.
  • Clear financial guidance on compensation and reimbursable costs to eliminate confusion.


5. Logistical Support
Practical barriers often determine whether participants complete a trial. Offering transportation support, multilingual capabilities, and digital tools for symptom tracking can make participation feasible for more patients.8 Post-trial engagement, such as sharing study outcomes, turns participants into advocates for future research, further strengthening the recruitment pipeline.
These levers shift site dynamics from a bottleneck to a competitive differentiator. And the impact goes beyond operational efficiency. When applied effectively, they translate into tangible financial returns, regulatory momentum, and faster patient access.
 
The ROI of Faster Dermatology Clinical Trials
 
In dermatology clinical research, time is not just money; it is impact. Every month shaved off from development creates advantages that ripple across science, business, and patient care, including:

  • Financial ROI: A one-month acceleration can generate $10–30 million in additional revenue for a successful dermatology therapy, particularly in competitive areas like psoriasis or atopic dermatitis.9
  • Regulatory momentum: Faster recruitment supports adaptive trial designs, increasingly favored by FDA for chronic and complex dermatology conditions.10 Early momentum improves regulatory confidence and keeps development on track for accelerated pathways.
  • Patient access and relief: For individuals with severe atopic dermatitis, cutaneous lymphomas, or rare blistering disorders, earlier access to clinical trials means earlier relief from debilitating symptoms.6

    Key Takeaway

    In dermatology, speed is both a competitive advantage and a patient lifeline. Sponsors that prioritize patient-centered engagement, accessible sites, and operational agility will define the next era of dermatology innovation.

    How Alliance Clinical Network Helps Sponsors Move Faster

    At Alliance Clinical Network, we partner with sponsors to turn site startup from a bottleneck into a driver of speed and inclusivity.
     
    Our approach combines:
  • Proven recruitment success with diverse, representative patient populations.
  • Strategically located sites in underserved communities to expand access and improve inclusivity.
  • End-to-end logistical support that reduces burden for both patients and sites.

1 Grand View Research. (2024). Dermatological drugs market size, share & trends analysis report by drug class (acne & rosacea, psoriasis, dermatitis), by route of administration, by distribution channel, by region, and segment forecasts, 2024–2030.
2 LaBiotech. (2024, June 14). From AI to telemedicine: Transforming clinical trial recruitment in 2024.
3 Huang, G. D., Bull, J., McKee, K. J., Mahon, E., Harper, B., & Roberts, J. N. (2018). Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 66, 74–79.
4 Snyder S, Crandell I, Davis SA, Feldman SR. Medical adherence to acne therapy: a systematic review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2014 Apr;15(2):87-94.
5 Alliance Clinical Network. Data on file.
6 Cobb CBC, Heath CR, Byrd AS, et al. The Skin of Color Society’s Meeting the Challenge Summit, 2022: Diversity in Dermatology Clinical Trials Proceedings. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(7):757–762.
7 Wang RH, Barbieri JS, Nguyen HP, Stavert R, Forman HP, Bolognia JL, Kovarik CL; Group for Research of Policy Dynamics in Dermatology. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of teledermatology: Where are we now, and what are the barriers to adoption? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jul;83(1):299-307.
8 DermTrials (Indiana University School of Medicine). (2024, September 18). The importance of diversity in dermatology clinical trials. Indiana University School of Medicine.
9 DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Hansen, R. W. (2016). Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. Journal of Health Economics, 47, 20–33.
10 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Adaptive designs for clinical trials of drugs and biologics: Guidance for industry.

Scroll to Top